Хэштег #brilliantlightpower в Твиттере ~ Life News

Brilliant Light Power's game-changing energy device that has water (H2O) as its only fuel input from which it produces 100 billion watts per liter of energetic This breakthrough transformational power technology can be witnessed in a live demonstration hosted by BlackLight of on January 28th at 11 AM.Like sunlight in a bottle SunCell® by Brilliant Light Power Tens of thousands of Sun equivalents that can be directly converted to electrical output Terraforming: One of Boundless Creative Power Applications Stationary Electric Generator The Grand Unified Theory of Classical Physics Welcome to...Black light power they were named. And no matter what the op says about naysayer, it was looked in properly and nothing came out of it. So you've purchased a truckload of Brilliant Light Power stock and you're gonna be a multi-billionaire - right? Since they aren't a public company, you have to be a...A potentially paradigm-shifting technology has been under development at an R&D firm in NJ called Brilliant Light Power. For people monitoring the situation, the question currently is about the status of commercialization. It is not a publicly held firm, but is in mid-stages of private equity capitalization in...Brilliant Light Power, previously Blacklight Power, has made such extravagant claims in the past that earned millions in investment. Randal does have some impressive education credentials and has had a paper recently accepted for Journal publication.

Brilliant Light Power | Brilliant Light Power has developed a new...

Brilliant Lighting. 1.3K likes. Brilliant is committed to be a leader in supplying innovative lighting, electrical and air movement products for tradeBrLP, Inc. (BRILLIIANT LIGHT POWER) has invented a new nonpolluting and economical primary energy source based on novel hydrogen chemistry.get reddit premium. BrilliantLightPower. join leave291 readers. Discussion of all things related to Brilliant Light Power including the SunCell, classical physics, hydrinos, the fifth force, etc.Brilliant Light Power has 23 employees at their 1 location and $15.62 m in total funding,. See insights on Brilliant Light Power including office Brilliant Light has successfully developed the technology to run long duration continuous hydrino reaction power at very high power levels and power gain.

Brilliant Light Power Going To Market... - International Skeptics Forum

Brilliant - Build quantitative skills in math, science, and computer science with fun and challenging interactive explorations. On Brilliant, your natural curiosity will drive you, not the threat of a test. See math and science in a new way. All of our courses are crafted by award-winning teachers..."Brilliant Light Power produces 100,000W of continuous steam power at the Homer building in Washington DC. This is the historical first of commercial scale Hydrino power contributing to heating of an office building in the Nation's Capital."Discussion of all things related to Brilliant Light Power including the SunCell, classical physics, hydrinos, the fifth force, etc. reddit metrics is a tool for tracking statistics of 2,600,523 subreddits (1785 created yesterday) and discovering the fastest growing communities on reddit.Brilliant Light Power has developed a new commercially competitive, non-polluting, plasma-based primary source of massive power from the conversion of hydrogen atoms of water molecules to dark matter, the previously unidentified matter that makes up most of the mass of the universe.According to Brilliant Light Power (formerly Blacklight Power), using a hydrated silver pellet weighing 70 mg, consisting of 0.1166 mg H2O and 69.8834 mg Ag, and hitting the pellet with 22kA at < 15 V, they obtained 44,870 J/g of energy, which is 9.7543 times the power density of TNT.

I decided to start out a new submit, as a result of a large problem of Reddit is, it turns into difficult to apply conversation threads after some time. Hecd's response to Wyatt's post about Hagen's analysis and conclusion that "the EPR lines indicate the molecule is Hydrino, and any other explanation is extremely unlikely" is bringing us to a conclusion about this debate.

Hecd and critics of Mills theory are contending that Hagen has not regarded as all probabilities and that his conclusion that "this is Hydrino and nothing else" is solely due to Hagen's incompetence or lack of creativeness. Basically, the rivalry is that there is an alternative reason for Graph D of web page 24 as a result of Hydrino is inconceivable on theoretical grounds. It's been identified that a lot of competent scientists have proposed or adopted mistaken guesses/analysis/conclusions, and Hagen has fallen into that camp in this case.

Now, this is getting into a space I'm better skilled for, statistics and possibilities. Put apart the contempt shown to Hagen's expertise in interpreting EPR traces (which I find height of vanity since the man spent his existence reading EPR traces). Let's just believe the proposal that there is some unknown reason behind the seen EPR lines. This thesis is very, highly not going for the following reason, the order of thesis and statement.

If an remark was once made and THEN a concept will get proposed to explain it, the arrogance in this type of conclusion isn't as high as when a thesis is proposed and then the statement is made. In most instances the place the scientists observe the fallacious path is in seeking to come up with a principle to explain an commentary. But, when a principle is proposed, equations are proposed, after which an statement similar to Hagen reported is made, the arrogance stage is prime that we're on target.

It's like, you practice a host of people that live lengthy, and then you definately get a hold of a principle like 'oh they eat a large number of fish.' Well, the arrogance level is low. But, when you propose that a pill made out of fish liver taken over ninety days decrease ldl cholesterol through 50% and then precisely that occurs, neatly then, we've got higher self assurance. The first is a wager, the second is the basis for FDA approval.

In this case, Mills proposed Hydrino exists (a general thesis), and EPR observations are made that fit the ones predictions, just compare Graph D and Graph E of web page 24 (all executed via Hagen). So then, let's consider the other possibility that some 'unknown molecule' nobody has regarded as is producing those traces, however Hagen missed it. Would it's an artifact? That's a firm no. An artifact does now not produce 37 traces noticed over 2,400 mins of EPR exposure. It's a molecule that Hagen has no longer thought to be.

Let's observe that logic for a bit here. One risk (that excludes intentional fraud) is that Randy 'ACCIDENTALLY' produced a in the past unknown subject matter (a minimum of, whose EPR traces are in the past unobserved) THROUGH the SunCell process, that exactly fit predicted Hydrino EPR characteristics and sent it to Hagen. All honest mistake.

I assume it is conceivable, however the chances are infinitesimally small. No. It would need to be manufactured to suit the bill. A fraud at the part of Randy Mills. That would imply Randy Mills has one way or the other engineered some unknown molecule (no longer Hydrino) that could hoodwink an EPR knowledgeable like Hagen. That presupposes intensive wisdom of EPR at the a part of Mills that could match or exceed Hagen's experience. Randy didn't/does no longer have access to EPR machines. I've by no means heard Randy discuss EPR until Hagen got here at the scene. This is also so extremely not likely, it beggars the thoughts.

In fact, all of the dismissal of scientists like Weinberg, Tse, Conrads and so forth. all presuppose Mills to be so excellent at most of these respective fields as as a way to idiot/hoodwink a lot of these mavens in their respective areas of expertise. Which is it? Mills is so inept as to be worse than 'high school' stage math? Or such a genius that he can fool the EPR skilled in EPR, CalTech chemistry professor at Ro-vibrational knowledge, plasma with director of plasma institute, on and on. What a 'Davinci like' genius that might be, simply amazing talents in so many other spaces. "I got a bridge to sell you." Ha ha. How naive would it's a must to be to believe the sort of situation? Either state of affairs.

No. When a general thesis is made that has transparent equations, and THEN remark corresponding to Hagen's is made, our self assurance is very high we're on the right track. I thank Wyatt (and Hecd too) for this dialogue, it's helping to crystalize my own ideas.